butcherbaby wrote:i also think the reason anyone responded at all was because JosieQ did not post an actual suggestion, but an inane and inappropriate rant about "OMGZ MAKEING ROOLZ FOR NO REAZUN FASHIST DICKTAYTOORS !!!11!one!!eleven!!1" about something that is not even a RULE, but a FEATURE, and they were trying to suggest that yes, there really COULD be a reason. though i agree with both you and Zia that it is most likely a coding issue, AND there are things higher on the 'to do' list than that.
butcherbaby wrote:i was just really annoyed by her post. being that choosing the final stage is a relatively recent feature, i don't think saying "it's TERRIBLE that you can only choose once!" is either very appreciative nor is it constructive. and comparing a knuffel feature to an unchangeable & iron-clad rule is just absurd. you might as well rant that it's draconian conspiracy that we can only dig a certain amount of times per day or that we are told what materials we MUST use in a quest.
It's easy to be rude and combative when you're talking AROUND someone and not TO them, isn't it coward? But even though you're a terrible hypocrite, ranting inanely and inappropriately yourself, I'll respond to your accusations.
Your problem is you didn't like either the suggestion or how I delivered it, so you, in a desperate effort to stab out and hopefully hit something that would cling to me, anything at all, winged out "inappropriate" and "inane" and lack-of-suggestion. The problem of course is that all your accusations are poorly thought-out and irrelevant.
My suggestion, which you claim I did not even have and was not related to any topic, was
directly related to Firn's original post saying she hated the way people suck up Knuffel's they don't want that other people might. I said that I myself have considered (and may someday) adopting five of one Knuffel, when I really just want ONE, in order to save them each in the possible five final states. Thus: Your wild stabs of not having "an actual suggestion" and it being "inappropriate" are wrong. There goes your other one that it's not "constructive" too.
Lastly inane means (hilarious how you used this word so exactly wrong): Lacking ideas, empty. My whole post is, by definition, an idea. It might be an angry, emotionally-laden idea, but it's an idea. Something that's angry isn't automatically inane. You've obviously latched onto that because you've been taught, like everyone, and apparently bought it, like most people, that any strong emotions make the person carrying them incapable of rational thought and thus an inane, inappropriate ranter. You're probably one of those people where if I lay out the most well-thought-out fantastic idea ever, completely eloquent and perfectly delivered, and then end it with "I mean fuck!" you say, "Oh see now, cursing is just a sign that you lack intelligence!" and then disregard everything that came before it.
But perhaps I'm being unfair. Let me think about it from your point of view. Make it so we can change the state more than once, then users won't have to adopt extra Knuffels just to have extra final states... oh yeah no, you're right, I've changed my mind. There's nothing more lacking in suggestion and inappropriate than that. Draconian conspiracy, lol rofl you know the word "draconian" so you must be right!
I mean fuck.
(0) 
(0)
