Lilandra

Joined: Apr 8th, '10, 15:18 Posts: 2975 Hugs: 52304 Location: On a semi-hiatus or something like that.
|
|
|
Drat it, I came too late to comment on our old 'dispute', so if I add anything to it, I will be taken as the one who cannot let things rest.
Alright, strike that, I will comment on the things I wouldn't want to leave uncommented and then keep my fingers afk, but will not take a side in the issue between JosieQ and butcherbaby since it seems it's "resolved" now (more less than more) or say who behaved worse. But I will say that 'fighting fire with fire' or rather 'fighting cursing with cursing' is neither constructive nor good for anything else (see Ziaheart's post for what a response can look like).butcherbaby wrote:lilandra, i think whoever suggested that it might be bandwidth issues was just trying to give a possible reason for only being able to choose the final stage once, rather than multiple times. Your point being? I said I didn't think it was = my opinion. Someone else said it might be = his opinion.butcherbaby wrote:i also think the reason anyone responded at all was because JosieQ did not post an actual suggestion, but an inane and inappropriate rant about "OMGZ MAKEING ROOLZ FOR NO REAZUN FASHIST DICKTAYTOORS !!!11!one!!eleven!!1" about something that is not even a RULE, but a FEATURE, and they were trying to suggest that yes, there really COULD be a reason. No, the reason I commented on it wasn't JosieQ's "rant" as you call it, but actually that this point concerns me a lot. I actually adopted more Knuffel than I need just because I want to be able to have more than one stage of the same Knuffel (and I would give some of my multiples up for adoption if we could change the final stage after deciding for one). I've addressed this point more than once in the past and I commented on it here.butcherbaby wrote:i don't think saying "it's TERRIBLE that you can only choose once!" is either very appreciative nor is it constructive Saying that something is "terrible" cannot be appreciative by definition.butcherbaby wrote:and comparing a knuffel feature to an unchangeable & iron-clad rule is just absurd. you might as well rant that it's draconian conspiracy that we can only dig a certain amount of times per day or that we are told what materials we MUST use in a quest. That's nonsense, in my opinion. Here's why: We can't change the final stage of a Knuffel. Except for Firn and starkad, nobody knows why. We've been speculating, but we don't know it yet. We don't see a reason how it would hurt anyone, so if it could be changed this way (without too much coding trouble), it would be a good thing. However, there is a good reason why we cannot dig unlimited times a day. If we could, tons of would be generated, making the inflation become much worse. After all, you'd only need to adopt one Knuffel and dig with it all day -> infinite . Therefore, your comparison is off - you compare the complaint over a seemingly useless restriction (again, we don't know for sure if it's needless) with an obviously necessarry restriction.
butcherbaby wrote:I don't think anybody was trying to imply that we should never post suggestions, requests, or ideas. maybe that they should just be posted in the proper forum, and perhaps not while frothing at the mouth.
I've heard it a bazillion times before that I should just deal with things (especially here on KofK) by people who are not in charge to make the decision whether to implement something. I've had the discussion over it just as often and it's annoying. And I'm tired of hearing people make 'soothing statements' just to calm things down. I like calm discussions, I'm not fond of flaming or anything in that way, but saying things that are either 100% unrelated or wrong or redudant just to make everyone feel better/nicer is annoying. In a recent dispute, someone complained about being badmouthed and falsely accused leading to someone else's comment that she didn't think anybody there was lying. What's the point of that? If someone feels falsely accused, let him state that, even if it means that someone else has to be accused of lying. Why am I telling you that? Because I'm tired of people trying to soothe things by stating that "nobody wants to do [insert random bad thing here]" just to make the dispute seem less serious, no matter if it's related to the topic or actually true. You were doing the same there. It's annoying in the same way as it is when you say other redundant and/or needless things or made general assumptions as to why people did something (you did as quoted).
In any way, I'm still waiting and hoping Firn will tell us the reason behind the limit. If there's one, I will accept things as they are. If it's "just" coding, I will wait and see if it will be changed.
And before anyone says I actually picked a side: I didn't. I commented on the things I minded. I'm also not fond of swearing (though I can't say it bothers me enough to point it out) and I do believe that JosieQ could've worded her statements nicer, however, this has already been addressed, so why would I repeat it?
(0) (0) |
|
|
|
|
            
Rest in peace, Alessandro. You won't be forgotten.
From the holy sea of golden flames
Flies the last winged unicorn
With its magic breath of innocence
Rising to the crystal throne 
|
|
|