aww my how cute

As long as the colored version is 'clean' (no random pixel floating around), I think she would pass just fine ^^

Thank you so much! ^__^ Now I just need my computer to be fixed and I can get back to it.

Hope your computer got fixed soon then

Hi there!

So, uh, I wish you could edit a stage of a pending wild knuffel...

I'd actually made an error - left in a layer I hadn't meant to - so I was slightly relieved to be rejected, (but, you know, rejection sucks, ha) ... and I sent it back in rearranged and with the error missing to see if this would be better (with changes pointed out):


Now I'm left sitting here thinking, maaaybe it would have been better to take off the necklace in the first stage? I didn't really think about that until now, which is annoying... ;; I guess I don't like how bare a lot of knuffels start with since you do have to look at 'm for 25 levels, you know? If I get rejected again, do you guys think that would be helpful?

Or any other thoughts? I got rejected because 1->2 looked identical in a small preview.

Oh wow that's an awesome knuffel!

It's likely it'll still be accepted, but if not, it's up to you if the necklace goes or not. I think it works perfectly fine either way. There's only two things I can really nitpick on and that's the eyes and the little staff (I think that's what it is) in his hand.

The staff could be removed from the first and added into the second, then actually evolve as in become more and more impressive until the end? That's just a suggestion, but it still works perfectly fine otherwise.

And the eyes seem to change from one to two (though you didn't mention that) and didn't really change after that. I don't know if that was intentional or not, but it could even be taken a step further with the eyes evolving into something different over time, but it's up to you.

But it's still an amazing knuffel and that's me nitpicking. It'll probably be accepted but if not that's just little differences you could make that I, at least, feel might improve it a bit, but again, it's already amazing.

Plushie Heartless wrote: It's harder making the "if not big, lots of little things" changing work than it would seem. ._.;

It is, believe me, it is <--- a person who loves simplicity thus all her wilds are simple and inevitably rejected again and again for "stages too similar"